I got an Asus and so far I'm pretty happy with it. It combines a lot of the things I liked about my Lenovo without having to deal with the general corporate skeeviness of Lenovo who I'm fairly convinced combine 1984 big brother issues with sheer programming stupidity. I'm not even a hacker and I can see how their adware opens up critical vulnerabilities in operating systems. All things considered, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out my screen failed because Lenovo decided it was time for me to buy a new computer and sent a kill command. (I promise, I'm not generally a paranoid person)
It's always possible that I will end up as distrustful of Asus, but I can't find many frustrated people online ranting about Asus and there are tons ranting about Lenovo.
So, the Lenovo died on Monday. After establishing I was already out of warranty, I even cracked it open to pull the battery and force a full reboot. (I actually enjoyed poking around in there, it's fascinating stuff. Silver lining, I guess) Tuesday, I went shopping and decided on my Asus. Unfortunately, I had to get it shipped and because I wasn't sure I'd be home on Thursday, I didn't get it until Friday. I suppose if I'd been really motivated, I could have found the machine somewhere in Atlanta, but I decided to wait and spend some time thinking through some things.
- Repair Costs - it seems disingenuous that it costs as much or more, in some cases, to replace or fix a component than buy a whole new machine. It feels like forced consumerism. I know that there are some valid reasons for this, but on the whole I think that component costs are deliberately inflated. I suspect (but don't know) that this is to support the infrastructure of industry which tends to base its bottom line on sales of new machines. I think that there is some equation out there that measures the point at which the average consumer will tolerate built in obsolescence and then prices repair/component costs to take advantage. After all, the companies are protecting their bottom lines and if they can get us to buy new computers even a year earlier that we otherwise would, that helps them so why not find a way to force it.
- Machine Recycling/Toxicity of Components - So if we are buying computers at a faster rate than we otherwise would, what happens to the cast off machines. That's a lot of waste when you sit down and think about it. In a perfect world, we are all trading them in or taking them to recycling centers (and the recycling centers are actually recycling them - which is not a given). However, I know a lot of people just throw them in the trash especially if they know their broken device has no trade-in value. Aside from the general landfill issue this creates, most people don't realize just how many toxic components are in our devices. Cadmium (used in device batteries) alone is causing huge problems in many poor countries where unscrupulous companies are dumping used-up tech.
- Microsoft Bullying - I hate microsoft. I really really do. I think it's a shoddy product and I think that they are big ole corporate bullies. I just think mac/apple is just as bad and that I don't have time to manage a linux system. The reason, therefore, that I stick with microsoft machines is that I better know how to get around and subvert microsoft idiocy. And yes, sometimes I bully it back. Microsoft is trying it's darnedest to keep people from using chrome on microsoft machines. Get over it Microsoft. Figure out how to make a browser that people actually want and you won't have to play playground bully anymore. Oh and by the way...I'm posting this through Chrome so neener neener neener.
- Privacy Concerns - Network security and privacy is this big scary thing. There are so many places and ways to lose control of your data and ultimately it all comes down to trust. Do you trust the people you buy your software from? At this stage it's no longer practical to write all your own apps and OS's. Things have gotten too sophisticated and complex. Even if you do program, your programs often make use of preexisting code. Exploits and snoops are everywhere and we have no real guarantee that a button to opt out really opts us out. It's just a digital button, it doesn't have to be connected to anything. We just are wired to think and trust that they do. I don't inherently trust these people. I used to code and know how easy it is to mess with people. I put most of reliance in vigilance and being too insignificant to bother with. Also, I tend to keep an eye on what the paranoid tech-savvy teenager set have to say about various companies. There are some advantages to being a teacher and teenagers know a lot more than people tend to give them credit for. They just don't always know things that we value. (That's a different issue though)
Nothing has changed, and none of these things are things I didn't already know. However, it's been a while since I really spent time thinking about it. The downtime was a good thing.