Alright, but what's new about that. Disney is forever adapting classic stories and departing mightily from their base material. So, I wasn't exactly shocked. Although in this case, it feels like Disney really tried to preserve the basic lesson of the story but ended up stripping away much of Pinocchio's character development.
I'm getting ahead of myself.

The fable works really on only one level, but there is some interesting subtly to it. Pinocchio is a puppet and therefore not real. In order to become real, he must learn to act as a 'good boy.' So to be human is to act in accordance with virtue. To act out of step with this virtues makes a person less than human. These virtues are explicitly stated several times. Good boys listen and obey their parent figures, they go to school, study, and work hard. They also are selfless to the needs of others, generous, industrious, and honest. Failing any of these virtues lands Pinocchio into trouble, but Collodi seems feel that dishonesty and slothfulness are particularly bad and reserves special punishments for them. When Pinocchio is dishonest his nose grows and slothfulness turns little boys into donkeys.
Pinocchio also fits the mold as an epic hero in the sense that he descends into the underworld (several times actually) and is transformed by it.
Collodi was writing in the time right after the unification of Italy and all his children's books are apparently didactic. He was addressing what he felt were the ills of the youth of his time. Apparently Italian youth were particularly dishonest and idle.
As is always the case, the book is better than the movie. Pinocchio is actually one of my least favorite Disney movies because it all seems so disjointed and episodic. The book puts those disjointed scenes in context and gives Pinocchio a real character arc.
No comments:
Post a Comment